PROGRAM: P-3
Title:
DATA CITATION FOR ANTARCTIC SCIENCES IN JAPANAbstract:
The Polar Environmental Data Science Center (PEDSC) has a significant task to archive and deliver the data
obtained from polar regions by Japanese related activities. Summary information (metadata) of all the archived
data are available to involved polar communities, together with more general interests by public domain. The
compiled metadata describe various science research disciplines (space and upper atmospheric sciences,
meteorology and glaciology, geosciences and biosciences) from both long- and short-term projects in the Arctic
and Antarctic, in which the majority are data from Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition (JARE) (Kanao et al.,
2014). These science branch cover almost studies on environmental changes and earth evolution viewed from
polar region. Inside the portal server for scientific metadata (http://scidbase.nipr.ac.jp/), 380 records have been
compiled as of July 2017.
Regarding these compiled metadata for all science branches, a sophisticated system that can automatically
attribute the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) are recently equipped inside the portal server. The DOIs can be
requested to "DataCite (https://www.datacite.org/)" through a gateway interface provided by "Japan Link Center
(JaLC; https://japanlinkcenter.org/)". The JaLC is Japanese organization authorized as one of the Registration
Agency (RA) which can provide the DOIs. Under the adequate evaluation procedures, the metadata and their
associated data with enough quality of publication procedure could be attributed by their DOIs with a "prefix" of
"10.17592". Under the DOI auto-numbering rule, the "suffix" part of the DOIs (i.e., the character string ordering)
is generated arbitrary in a manner defined by the metadata portal. After receiving offers to obtain DOIs from the
data providers/managers, quality of individual data can be strictly evaluated by involved "data management
committee", followed by attributing their DOIs for those with sufficient revel of quality for opening/publishing
the data into public domain. There are several evaluation terms before assignment of the DOIs; regarding data
quality, publishing methodology, long-term maintenance strategy, and their data policy, etc.; these evaluation
items should be overcome in both the description of the metadata itself and the quality of corresponding actual
dataset.
Promoting data citation procedure introduced here could be a model case with an effective framework for
long-term strategy of publication and preservation of polar data among global system. Moreover, the approach of
data citation conducted by this study could have a potential as socially relevant applications to the public domain,
in addition to polar community (Parsons & Fox, 2013; Lawrence et al., 2011).
Acknowledgements:
The authors would like to express their appreciation to many collaborators involving polar data management, in particular to the member of PEDSC, data committee on SCAR, IASC, WDS, CODATA and IPY.
References:
Kanao, M., Okada, M. & Kadokura, A. (2014) Metadata Management at the Polar Data Center of the National
Institute of Polar Research, Japan. CODATA Data Science Journal 13, pp PDA27-PDA31. DOI:
10.2481/dsj.IFPDA-05
Lawrence, B., Jones, C., Matthews, B., Pepler, S., & Callaghan, S. (2011) Citation and peer review of data:
Moving towards formal data publication. International Journal of Digital Curation. 6(2).
Parsons M.A. & Fox, P.A. (2013) Is Data Publication the Right Metaphor? CODATA Data Science Journal 12,
pp WDS32-WDS46.